0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_portfolio.sh /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FaKhWoEJds 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 180 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 29 15:37:22 EDT 2019 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : 34.67/34.90 % Running portfolio for 180 s 34.67/34.90 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 34.67/34.90 % TempDir : /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FaKhWoEJds 34.67/34.90 % Recognized as monomorphic HO. 34.67/34.90 % Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/competitive.sh for 18 34.67/34.90 % Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/competitive.2.sh for 13 34.67/34.90 % Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/competitive.3.sh for 3 34.67/34.90 % Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/pragmatic.rudimentary.sh for 28 34.67/34.90 % Solved by: pragmatic.rudimentary.sh 34.67/34.90 % done 414 iterations in 0.845s 34.67/34.90 % hashcons stats for terms: size 4096, num 3745, sum length 14294, buckets: small 3, median 3, big 13 34.67/34.90 % proof state stats: {active 147, passive 2932, simpl 0} 34.67/34.90 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p' 34.67/34.90 % SZS output start Refutation 34.67/34.90 tff(mreflexive, axiom, mreflexive() = ^[R:(($i * $i) > $o)]: (![S]: R(S,S))). 34.67/34.90 tff('0', plain, mreflexive = (^[V_1:(($i * $i) > $o)]: (![X2]: V_1(X2,X2))), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(ax1, axiom, (mreflexive(rk))). 34.67/34.90 tff(zf_stmt_0, axiom, (![X2]: rk(X2,X2))). 34.67/34.90 tff('1', plain, ![X110]: rk(X110, X110), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])). 34.67/34.90 tff(mserial, axiom, mserial() = 34.67/34.90 ^[R:(($i * $i) > $o)]: (![S]: (?[T]: R(S,T)))). 34.67/34.90 tff('2', plain, 34.67/34.90 mserial = (^[V_1:(($i * $i) > $o)]: (![X2]: (?[X3]: V_1(X2,X3)))), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(ax2, axiom, (mserial(rb))). 34.67/34.90 tff(zf_stmt_1, axiom, (![X2]: (?[X3]: rb(X2,X3)))). 34.67/34.90 tff('3', plain, ![X106]: rb(X106, sk_X3_(X106)), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])). 34.67/34.90 tff(mvalid, axiom, mvalid() = ^[Phi:($i > $o)]: (![W]: Phi(W))). 34.67/34.90 tff('4', plain, mvalid = (^[V_1:($i > $o)]: (![X2]: V_1(X2))), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(mbox, axiom, mbox() = 34.67/34.90 ^[R:(($i * $i) > $o),Phi:($i > $o),W]: (![V]: (Phi(V) | (~R(W,V))))). 34.67/34.90 tff('5', plain, 34.67/34.90 mbox = 34.67/34.90 (^[V_1:(($i * $i) > $o),V_2:($i > $o),V_3]: 34.67/34.90 (![X2]: (V_2(X2) | (~V_1(V_3,X2))))), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(mforall_prop, axiom, mforall_prop() = 34.67/34.90 ^[Phi:(($i > $o * $i) > $o),W]: (![P:($i > $o)]: Phi(P,W))). 34.67/34.90 tff('6', plain, 34.67/34.90 mforall_prop = 34.67/34.90 (^[V_1:(($i > $o * $i) > $o),V_2]: (![X2:($i > $o)]: V_1(X2,V_2))), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(mimplies, axiom, mimplies() = 34.67/34.90 ^[Phi:($i > $o),Psi:($i > $o)]: mor(mnot(Phi),Psi)). 34.67/34.90 tff('7', plain, 34.67/34.90 mimplies = (^[V_1:($i > $o),V_2:($i > $o)]: mor(mnot(V_1),V_2)), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(mor, axiom, mor() = ^[Phi:($i > $o),Psi:($i > $o),W]: (Psi(W) | Phi(W))). 34.67/34.90 tff('8', plain, 34.67/34.90 mor = (^[V_1:($i > $o),V_2:($i > $o),V_3]: (V_2(V_3) | V_1(V_3))), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(mnot, axiom, mnot() = ^[Phi:($i > $o),W]: (~Phi(W))). 34.67/34.90 tff('9', plain, mnot = (^[V_1:($i > $o),V_2]: (~V_1(V_2))), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(ax7, axiom, 34.67/34.90 (mvalid(mforall_prop(^[A:($i > $o)]: mimplies(mbox(rk,A),mbox(rb,A)))))). 34.67/34.90 tff(zf_stmt_2, axiom, 34.67/34.90 (![X2,X3:($i > $o)]: 34.67/34.90 ((![X4]: (X3(X4) | (~rb(X2,X4)))) | (~(![X5]: (X3(X5) | (~rk(X2,X5)))))))). 34.67/34.90 tff('10', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X107, X108, X109 : $i > $o]: 34.67/34.90 (~ rb(X107, X108) | X109(X108) | ~ X109(sk_X5_(X109, X107))), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 34.67/34.90 tff('11', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X0, X1 : $i > $o]: (~ X1(sk_X5_(X1, X0)) | X1(sk_X3_(X0))), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['3', '10'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('12', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X107, X108, X109 : $i > $o]: 34.67/34.90 (~ rb(X107, X108) | X109(X108) | rk(X107, sk_X5_(X109, X107))), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])). 34.67/34.90 tff('13', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X0, X1 : $i > $o]: (rk(X0, sk_X5_(X1, X0)) | X1(sk_X3_(X0))), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['3', '12'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('14', plain, ![X0]: (rk(X0, sk_X3_(X0)) | rk(X0, sk_X3_(X0))), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], ['11', '13'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('15', plain, ![X0]: rk(X0, sk_X3_(X0)), 34.67/34.90 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], ['14'])). 34.67/34.90 tff(conj, conjecture, 34.67/34.90 (mvalid(mforall_prop(^[A:($i > $o)]: mimplies(mbox(rb,A),mbox(rk,A)))))). 34.67/34.90 tff(zf_stmt_3, conjecture, 34.67/34.90 (![X2,X3:($i > $o)]: 34.67/34.90 ((![X4]: (X3(X4) | (~rk(X2,X4)))) | (~(![X5]: (X3(X5) | (~rb(X2,X5)))))))). 34.67/34.90 tff(zf_stmt_4, negated_conjecture, 34.67/34.90 (~ 34.67/34.90 (![X2,X3:($i > $o)]: 34.67/34.90 ((![X4]: (X3(X4) | (~rk(X2,X4)))) | 34.67/34.90 (~(![X5]: (X3(X5) | (~rb(X2,X5))))))))). 34.67/34.90 tff('16', plain, rk(sk_X2_, sk_X4_), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_4])). 34.67/34.90 tff(meuclidean, axiom, meuclidean() = 34.67/34.90 ^[R:(($i * $i) > $o)]: (![S,T,U]: ((R(S,U) & R(S,T)) => R(T,U)))). 34.67/34.90 tff('17', plain, 34.67/34.90 meuclidean = 34.67/34.90 (^[V_1:(($i * $i) > $o)]: 34.67/34.90 (![X2,X3,X4]: ((V_1(X2,X4) & V_1(X2,X3)) => V_1(X3,X4)))), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(ax5, axiom, (meuclidean(rk))). 34.67/34.90 tff(zf_stmt_5, axiom, (![X2,X3,X4]: ((rk(X2,X4) & rk(X2,X3)) => rk(X3,X4)))). 34.67/34.90 tff('18', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X90, X91, X92]: (~ rk(X90, X91) | ~ rk(X90, X92) | rk(X91, X92)), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_5])). 34.67/34.90 tff('19', plain, ![X0]: (rk(sk_X4_, X0) | ~ rk(sk_X2_, X0)), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['16', '18'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('20', plain, rk(sk_X4_, sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['15', '19'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('21', plain, ![X0]: (rk(sk_X3_(sk_X2_), X0) | ~ rk(sk_X4_, X0)), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['20', '18'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('22', plain, rk(sk_X3_(sk_X2_), sk_X4_), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['1', '21'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('23', plain, ![X0, X1]: (rk(sk_X3_(X0), X1) | ~ rk(X0, X1)), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['15', '18'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('24', plain, rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), sk_X4_), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['22', '23'])). 34.67/34.90 tff(mtransitive, axiom, mtransitive() = 34.67/34.90 ^[R:(($i * $i) > $o)]: (![S,T,U]: ((R(T,U) & R(S,T)) => R(S,U)))). 34.67/34.90 tff('25', plain, 34.67/34.90 mtransitive = 34.67/34.90 (^[V_1:(($i * $i) > $o)]: 34.67/34.90 (![X2,X3,X4]: ((V_1(X3,X4) & V_1(X2,X3)) => V_1(X2,X4)))), 34.67/34.90 define([status(thm)])). 34.67/34.90 tff(ax4, axiom, (mtransitive(rb))). 34.67/34.90 tff(zf_stmt_6, axiom, (![X2,X3,X4]: ((rb(X3,X4) & rb(X2,X3)) => rb(X2,X4)))). 34.67/34.90 tff('26', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X99, X100, X101]: (~ rb(X99, X100) | ~ rb(X100, X101) | rb(X99, X101)), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_6])). 34.67/34.90 tff('27', plain, ![X0, X1]: (rb(X0, X1) | ~ rb(sk_X3_(X0), X1)), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['3', '26'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('28', plain, ![X0]: rb(X0, sk_X3_(sk_X3_(X0))), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['3', '27'])). 34.67/34.90 tff(ax8, axiom, 34.67/34.90 (mvalid(mforall_prop(^[A:($i > $o)]: 34.67/34.90 mimplies(mbox(rb,A),mbox(rb,mbox(rk,A))))))). 34.67/34.90 tff(zf_stmt_7, axiom, 34.67/34.90 (![X2,X3:($i > $o)]: 34.67/34.90 ((![X4]: ((![X5]: (X3(X5) | (~rk(X4,X5)))) | (~rb(X2,X4)))) | 34.67/34.90 (~(![X6]: (X3(X6) | (~rb(X2,X6)))))))). 34.67/34.90 tff('29', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X102, X103, X104 : $i > $o, X105]: 34.67/34.90 (~ rb(X102, X103) 34.67/34.90 | X104(X105) 34.67/34.90 | ~ rk(X103, X105) 34.67/34.90 | rb(X102, sk_X6_(X104, X102))), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_7])). 34.67/34.90 tff('30', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X0, X1 : $i > $o, X2]: 34.67/34.90 (rb(X0, sk_X6_(X1, X0)) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(X0)), X2) | X1(X2)), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['28', '29'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('31', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X102, X103, X104 : $i > $o, X105]: 34.67/34.90 (~ rb(X102, X103) 34.67/34.90 | X104(X105) 34.67/34.90 | ~ rk(X103, X105) 34.67/34.90 | ~ X104(sk_X6_(X104, X102))), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_7])). 34.67/34.90 tff('32', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X0, X1 : $i > $o, X2]: 34.67/34.90 (~ X1(sk_X6_(X1, X0)) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(X0)), X2) | X1(X2)), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['28', '31'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('33', plain, ![X111]: (sk_X3_1(X111) | ~ rb(sk_X2_, X111)), 34.67/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_4])). 34.67/34.90 tff('34', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X0, X1]: 34.67/34.90 (~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(X1)), X0) 34.67/34.90 | ~ rb(sk_X2_, sk_X6_(rb(sk_X2_), X1)) 34.67/34.90 | sk_X3_1(X0)), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['32', '33'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('35', plain, 34.67/34.90 ![X0, X1]: 34.67/34.90 (rb(sk_X2_, X1) 34.67/34.90 | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X1) 34.67/34.90 | sk_X3_1(X0) 34.67/34.90 | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X0)), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['30', '34'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('36', plain, 34.67/34.90 (![X1]: (rb(sk_X2_, X1) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X1))) 34.67/34.90 <= ((![X1]: (rb(sk_X2_, X1) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X1)))), 34.67/34.90 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['35'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('37', plain, 34.67/34.90 (![X0]: (~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X0) | sk_X3_1(X0))) 34.67/34.90 <= ((![X1]: (rb(sk_X2_, X1) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X1)))), 34.67/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['36', '33'])). 34.67/34.90 tff('38', plain, 34.67/34.90 (sk_X3_1(sk_X4_)) 34.75/34.90 <= ((![X1]: (rb(sk_X2_, X1) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X1)))), 34.75/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['24', '37'])). 34.75/34.90 tff('39', plain, 34.75/34.90 (![X1]: (rb(sk_X2_, X1) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X1))) | 34.75/34.90 (![X0]: (sk_X3_1(X0) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X0))), 34.75/34.90 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['35'])). 34.75/34.90 tff('40', plain, 34.75/34.90 (![X0]: (sk_X3_1(X0) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X0))) 34.75/34.90 <= ((![X0]: (sk_X3_1(X0) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X0)))), 34.75/34.90 inference('split', [status(esa)], ['35'])). 34.75/34.90 tff('41', plain, 34.75/34.90 (sk_X3_1(sk_X4_)) 34.75/34.90 <= ((![X0]: (sk_X3_1(X0) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X0)))), 34.75/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['24', '40'])). 34.75/34.90 tff('42', plain, ~ sk_X3_1(sk_X4_), 34.75/34.90 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_4])). 34.75/34.90 tff('43', plain, ~ (![X0]: (sk_X3_1(X0) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X0))), 34.75/34.90 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['41', '42'])). 34.75/34.90 tff('44', plain, 34.75/34.90 (![X1]: (rb(sk_X2_, X1) | ~ rk(sk_X3_(sk_X3_(sk_X2_)), X1))), 34.75/34.90 inference('sat_resolution', [status(thm)], ['39', '43'])). 34.75/34.90 tff('45', plain, sk_X3_1(sk_X4_), 34.75/34.90 inference('simpl_trail', [status(thm)], ['38', '44'])). 34.75/34.90 tff('46', plain, $false, inference('sup-', [status(thm)], ['45', '42'])). 34.75/34.90 34.75/34.90 % SZS output end Refutation 34.75/34.90 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting 34.75/34.90 EOF